Journal of Clinical Research in Paramedical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar
Crossmark
Uncorrected Proof scheduled for 8 (1)

Relationships of the Functional Movement Screen Test with the Proprioception of the Core and Anthropometric Characteristics in Female Athletes

Asma Zibaie 1 , Rahman Sheikhhoseini ORCID 1 , * and Farideh Babakhani 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Corrective Exercise and Sport Injury, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Journal of Clinical Research in Paramedical Sciences: In Press (In Press); e87461
  • Published Online: June 12, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 12, 2018
  • Revised: May 12, 2019
  • Accepted: May 15, 2019
  • DOI: 10.5812/jcrps.87461

To Cite: Zibaie A, Sheikhhoseini R, Babakhani F. Relationships of the Functional Movement Screen Test with the Proprioception of the Core and Anthropometric Characteristics in Female Athletes, J Clin Res Paramed Sci. Online ahead of Print ; In Press(In Press):e87461. doi: 10.5812/jcrps.87461.

Abstract
Copyright © 2019, Journal of Clinical Research in Paramedical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Pourheydari S, Sheikhhoseini R, Hosseini SG. Correlation between the functional movement screen (FMS) test with dynamic balance and core endurance in male and female volleyball players in Kerman province. J Clin Physiother Res. 2018;3(2):64-9.
  • 2. Frost DM, Beach TA, Callaghan JP, McGill SM. Using the functional movement screen to evaluate the effectiveness of training. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(6):1620-30. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234ec59. [PubMed: 21921825].
  • 3. Cook G. Movement : functional movement systems : screening, assessment, and corrective strategies. Aptos, CA: On Target Publications; 2010. p. 1-60.
  • 4. Liebenson C. Functional training handbook. 1 ed. LWW; 2014.
  • 5. Martin C, Olivier B, Benjamin N. The functional movement screen in the prediction of injury in adolescent cricket pace bowlers: An observational study. J Sport Rehabil. 2017;26(5):386-95. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2016-0073. [PubMed: 27632872].
  • 6. Kraus K, Schutz E, Taylor WR, Doyscher R. Efficacy of the functional movement screen: A review. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(12):3571-84. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000556. [PubMed: 24918299].
  • 7. Kibler WB, Press J, Sciascia A. The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med. 2006;36(3):189-98. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200636030-00001. [PubMed: 16526831].
  • 8. Lee AS, Cholewicki J, Reeves NP, Zazulak BT, Mysliwiec LW. Comparison of trunk proprioception between patients with low back pain and healthy controls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(9):1327-31. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.004. [PubMed: 20801248]. [PubMed Central: PMC4896302].
  • 9. Stillman BC. Making sense of proprioception: The meaning of proprioception, kinaesthesia and related terms. Physiotherapy. 2002;88(11):667-6. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9406(05)60109-5.
  • 10. Mortezaiefar S, Sarafzade J, Ahmadi A. [Lumbar repositioning in chronic low back pain and healthy females]. J Mod Rehabil. 2012;5(4):21-7. Persian.
  • 11. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
  • 12. Holm I, Fosdahl MA, Friis A, Risberg MA, Myklebust G, Steen H. Effect of neuromuscular training on proprioception, balance, muscle strength, and lower limb function in female team handball players. Clin J Sport Med. 2004;14(2):88-94. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200403000-00006. [PubMed: 15014342].
  • 13. Claessens AL, Hlatky S, Lefevre J, Holdhaus H. The role of anthropometric characteristics in modern pentathlon performance in female athletes. J Sports Sci. 1994;12(4):391-401. doi: 10.1080/02640419408732186. [PubMed: 7932950].
  • 14. Catt I. Time loss through gating of asynchronous logic signal pulses. IEEE Trans Comput. 1966;EC-15(1):108-11. doi: 10.1109/pgec.1966.264407.
  • 15. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional movement screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 2. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(4):549-63. [PubMed: 25133083]. [PubMed Central: PMC4127517].
  • 16. Brumagne S, Lysens R, Spaepen A. Lumbosacral position sense during pelvic tilting in men and women without low back pain: test development and reliability assessment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999;29(6):345-51. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1999.29.6.345. [PubMed: 10370918].
  • 17. Brumagne S, Cordo P, Lysens R, Verschueren S, Swinnen S. The role of paraspinal muscle spindles in lumbosacral position sense in individuals with and without low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(8):989-94. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200004150-00015. [PubMed: 10767813].
  • 18. Armsey TD, Hosey RG. Medical aspects of sports: Epidemiology of injuries, preparticipation physical examination, and drugs in sports. Clin Sports Med. 2004;23(2):255-79. vii. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2004.04.007. [PubMed: 15183571].
  • 19. Kobayashi H, Kakihana W, Kimura T. Combined effects of age and gender on gait symmetry and regularity assessed by autocorrelation of trunk acceleration. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:109. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-109. [PubMed: 24993146]. [PubMed Central: PMC4105560].
  • 20. Greve JM, Cug M, Dulgeroglu D, Brech GC, Alonso AC. Relationship between anthropometric factors, gender, and balance under unstable conditions in young adults. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:850424. doi: 10.1155/2013/850424. [PubMed: 23509788]. [PubMed Central: PMC3581282].
  • 21. Alonso AC, Mochizuki L, Silva Luna NM, Ayama S, Canonica AC, Greve JM. Relation between the sensory and anthropometric variables in the quiet standing postural control: Is the inverted pendulum important for the static balance control? Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:985312. doi: 10.1155/2015/985312. [PubMed: 26539550]. [PubMed Central: PMC4619896].
  • 22. Heller J, Peric T, Dlouha R, Kohlikova E, Melichna J, Novakova H. Physiological profiles of male and female taekwon-do (ITF) black belts. J Sports Sci. 1998;16(3):243-9. doi: 10.1080/026404198366768. [PubMed: 9596358].
  • 23. Kiesel K, Plisky PJ, Voight ML. Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a preseason functional movement screen? N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2007;2(3):147-58. [PubMed: 21522210]. [PubMed Central: PMC2953296].
  • 24. Bushman TT, Grier TL, Canham-Chervak M, Anderson MK, North WJ, Jones BH. The functional movement screen and injury risk: Association and predictive value in active men. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(2):297-304. doi: 10.1177/0363546515614815. [PubMed: 26657573].
  • 25. Proske U, Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: Their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev. 2012;92(4):1651-97. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00048.2011. [PubMed: 23073629].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments